>Received: from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21])
	by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9724457306; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 22:02:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ch.sauter-bc.com (ppp01.cad.sba [10.1.249.1])
	by mobile.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C0B6B25835; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 22:10:54 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <3B3CDC71.C536B5C4@ch.sauter-bc.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 21:52:17 +0200
From: Simon Matter <Simon.Matter@ch.sauter-bc.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.7 i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Klaassen <ak@dkp.com>
Cc: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: XFS corruption on SoftRAID5
References: <200106282148.f5SLmfw24451@jen.americas.sgi.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010629090815.02e71aa8@pop.xs4all.nl> <3B3C3C56.73D1C11C@ch.sauter-bc.com> <yq1bsn745ex.fsf@jcb.mkp.net> <20010629130641.B782@dkp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by oss.sgi.com id f5TKnHV15368
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

Andrew Klaassen schrieb:

> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 12:28:06PM -0400,
> Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> > FWIW, almost all the XFS corruption bugs (with RAID or
> > otherwise) I've seen so far have been incorrect IDE hdparm
> > tuning or bad cabling.
>
> My question is really OT for this list, but how might one go
> about checking for bad cabling?  Is there any software that can
> find it consistently?
>
> Andrew Klaassen

IBM's drive fittness test tool claims to test cabling, but I don't know.