Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f5SNXtg20110 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:33:55 -0700 Received: from home.smithconcepts.com (ubr-35.28.151.oviedo.cfl.rr.com [65.35.28.151]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f5SNXUV20087 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:33:30 -0700 Received: from ieee.org (IDENT:bjsmith@bitman.oviedo.smithconcepts.com [172.24.24.192]) by home.smithconcepts.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA08141; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 19:27:04 -0400 Message-ID: <3B3BC18C.FF7C9E2E@ieee.org> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 19:45:16 -0400 From: "Bryan J. Smith" Organization: SmithConcepts, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon Matter CC: linux-xfs Subject: Re: XFS corruption on SoftRAID5 References: <3B3B6A45.3252B37C@ch.sauter-bc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Simon Matter wrote: > Then I installed one Promise Ultra100TX2 IDE controller, > connecting 4 IBM 60GB drives. Ouch! Talk about a performance bottleneck (using ATA drives as "slaves"). And I don't want to even get started with the Promise cards and drivers themselves. > My next steps before giving up: > - I have installed a second Prosime controller to make sure every IDE > disk has it's own channel. (Don't blame Promise, I had exactly the same > prob with the i820 IDE of the DELL Precision 220). Test is running right > now... Er, by this time, you could have spend a few buck more and gotten a 4-channel 3Ware Escalade 6000 or, better yet, 7000-series (~$200-225). Then you'd have _real_, independent, microcontroller-driven hardware RAID-5 from the system perspective. Then "device" would then look like a single, "dumb" drive. Plus the 3Ware driver has been in the stock kernel since 2.2.15. > - Configuring the 4 IDE disks as RAID10 and test again. I will loose > 60GB, but at least we then know that SoftRAID5 with IDE with XFS with > ... with ... is DANGEROUS(tm). > - Try with ext2 on the RAID5 :-( I thought the whole 2.4 kernel and software RAID-5 was not recommended, no matter what fs you use? -- TheBS -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org chat:thebs413 SmithConcepts, Inc. http://www.SmithConcepts.com ========================================================== Linux 'Worms' exploit known security holes that were fixed 3-12 months earlier. NT/2000 'Worms' exploit unknown se- curity holes that won't be fixed for another 3-12 months.