Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 00:44:32 -0400
From: Alan Eldridge <alane@geeksrus.net>
To: Keith Owens <kaos@melbourne.sgi.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Russell's patch against RH 7.1 ...
Message-ID: <20010609004432.A12217@wwweasel.geeksrus.net>
References: <20010608233837.A11062@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> <8648.992061344@ocs4.ocs-net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <8648.992061344@ocs4.ocs-net>; from kaos@melbourne.sgi.com on Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:35:44PM +1000
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:35:44PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
>On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 23:38:37 -0400, 
>Alan Eldridge <alane@geeksrus.net> wrote:
>>Knowing how heavily patched the RH kernels are (!!), does anyone know if
>>there'd be impairment or malfunction running a stock + xfs kernel on a RH
>>system?
>
>I know that Russell Cattelan did an XFS+kdb patch for Redhat 7.1.  I
>also know it took a *looong* time, fitting just the kdb patch into all
>the RH bits and pieces from the -ac tree took me about 8 hours, and I
>had all the tools to do the job.
>
>Russell, did that XFS for RH 7.1 patch get released?

The patch I'm using is one he did last night. It's for RH Rawhide
2.4.5-0.2.9 kernel. It's on ftp.thebarn.com in /SGI/testing.


-- 
Alan Eldridge
"I've told you once."
"No you haven't."