Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f4VNgOL13696
	for linux-xfs-outgoing; Thu, 31 May 2001 16:42:24 -0700
Received: from opus.sandiegoca.ncr.com (tan7.ncr.com [192.127.94.7])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f4VNgKh13679
	for <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 31 May 2001 16:42:20 -0700
Received: from localhost (chuckr@localhost)
	by opus.sandiegoca.ncr.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f4VNj6F43535;
	Thu, 31 May 2001 16:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from chuckr@opus.sandiegoca.ncr.com)
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 16:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chuck Rouillard <chuckr@opus.sandiegoca.ncr.com>
To: Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>
cc: Austin Gonyou <austin@coremetrics.com>, <georgeb@unitbv.ro>,
   <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: does it work on 2.4.4 
In-Reply-To: <200105312229.f4VMT9T14628@jen.americas.sgi.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0105311555490.43041-100000@opus.sandiegoca.ncr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk


Steve,

Could you elaborate? The singular patch method has been kinda
handy (and speedy) for local test system builds. I guess that
the patches were provided to prime the CVS pump but we really
don't need the newest, just consistency. Applying the patches
works nicely for us... so far :-). We're currently testing on
(with) highly modified Debian matter.

Thanks,

.cr

On Thu, 31 May 2001, Steve Lord wrote:

> > Woops..No 2.4.5 yet..but 2.4.4 is still out there.
>
> Looking into it now, not sure I am going to put out patches in the same
> manner as Russell did .....
>
> Steve
>
> >
> > --
> > Austin Gonyou
> > Systems Architect, CCNA
> > Coremetrics, Inc.
> > Phone: 512-796-9023
> > email: austin@coremetrics.com
> >
> > On Thu, 31 May 2001, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> >
> > > latest kernel is 2.4.5, previous kernel was 2.4.4. Patches are currently
> > > available for both.
> > >
> > >