Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f43Fs7704827 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Thu, 3 May 2001 08:54:07 -0700 Received: from mail11.jump.net (mail11.jump.net [206.196.91.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f43Fs6F04824 for ; Thu, 3 May 2001 08:54:06 -0700 Received: from sgi.com (aus-dsl-dhcp6-198.customer.jump.net [63.163.173.198]) by mail11.jump.net (8.10.2/) with ESMTP id f43FrwL28945; Thu, 3 May 2001 10:53:59 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <3AF17F70.B1895FAD@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 10:55:28 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0smp i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Austin Gonyou CC: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: devfsd-1.3.11-1 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Austin Gonyou wrote: > > How easy would it be to just patch a 2.4.4 kernel and NOT use devfsd. I'm > having too many problems to actually spend as much time as I'll have to to > fix it. I DO want to spend the time, but I don't have the time to spend > right now. Ideas? To get rid of devfsd, just turn it off in the kernel config, or pass "devfsd=nomount" on the lilo command line. Also, please remember that 2.4.4 is not yet well tested at all... -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@sgi.com SGI, Inc.