Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f4G6Afr30459 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Tue, 15 May 2001 23:10:41 -0700 Received: from rmx441-mta.mail.com (rmx441-mta.mail.com [165.251.48.44]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4G6AeF30455 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 23:10:40 -0700 Received: from weba7.iname.net (weba07.mail.com [165.251.4.17]) by rmx441-mta.mail.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA04163; Wed, 16 May 2001 02:10:27 -0400 (EDT) From: lmj@homemail.com Received: (from root@localhost) by weba7.iname.net (8.9.1a/8.9.2.Alpha2) id CAA20934; Wed, 16 May 2001 02:10:26 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0105160210265M.00126@weba7.iname.net> Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 02:10:26 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: Text/Plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Patch problem Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Hello This is practically identical to a question posted by Jan Jonasson on 2 May. Using the answers posted in that mail thread I still have a problem with this new patch for 2.4.4. I'm trying to apply the linux-2.4.4-xfs-cvs-05152001.patch.gz on a 2.4.4 kernel according to the instructions at http://linux-xfs.sgi.com/projects/xfs/1.0_source.html . I apply the patch in the /usr/src/linux directory, using the -p1 flag. I get the following messages: patching file linux/Documentation/CVS/Entries patching file linux/Documentation/CVS/Repository patching file linux/Documentation/CVS/Root can't find file to patch at input line 326553 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -rNu linux-2.4.4/linux/Documentation/Changes linux-2.4-xfs/linux/Documentation/Changes |--- linux-2.4.4/linux/Documentation/Changes Wed Apr 11 21:02:27 2001 |+++ linux-2.4-xfs/linux/Documentation/Changes Wed May 2 01:22:13 2001 -------------------------- File to patch: Similar errors are reported from other subdirectories, not just Documentation. All of them seem to have one thing in common and that is that they want to patch a file in a CVS subdirectory. What am I doing wrong? Another question. How stable is this patch compared to patches for 2.4.2 and 2.4.3? Thanks Magnus Johansson (I am not on the mailing list.) ------------------------------------------------------ Get the Latest News at CNN Interactive: http://CNN.com