Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f3IDeDv29347 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 06:40:13 -0700 Received: from home.smithconcepts.com (ubr-35.28.151.oviedo.cfl.rr.com [65.35.28.151]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f3IDeBM29344 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 06:40:12 -0700 Received: from ieee.org (IDENT:bjsmith@bitman.oviedo.smithconcepts.com [172.24.24.192]) by home.smithconcepts.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA29618; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 09:34:42 -0400 Message-ID: <3ADD9BBD.DECCC102@ieee.org> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 09:50:53 -0400 From: "Bryan J. Smith" Reply-To: b.j.smith@ieee.org, thebs@theseus.com Organization: SmithConcepts/Personal X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.18-0.13 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com CC: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Off-topic] As I said, VALinux seems to be squarely behind Ext3 for kernel 2.2 ... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk [Off-topic] As I said, VALinux seems to be squarely behind Ext3 for kernel 2.2 ... http://www.idg.net/go.cgi?id=461437 I'm still wondering what their kernel 2.4 JFS strategy will be though? Are they waiting on the Ext3 port to 2.4? Or are they waiting on RedHat to adopt XFS? Or are they evaluating XFS now? -- TheBS CC: SourceForge NFS -- Bryan "TheBS" Smith chat:thebs413 @AOL/MSN/Yahoo Engineer mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org,thebs@theseus.com ******************************************************** "Linux will do for applications what the Internet did to networks" -- Sam Palmisano, IBM Chief Operating Officer