Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f3IM78b24946 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:07:08 -0700 Received: from tytlal (nat-hdqt.valinux.com [198.186.202.17]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f3IM77M24943 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:07:07 -0700 Received: from chip by tytlal with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14q05A-0007sh-00; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:05:52 -0700 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:05:52 -0700 From: Chip Salzenberg To: b.j.smith@ieee.org, thebs@theseus.com Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: VALinux and Ext3 Message-ID: <20010418150552.T7975@valinux.com> References: <3ADD9BBD.DECCC102@ieee.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: <3ADD9BBD.DECCC102@ieee.org>; from b.j.smith@ieee.org on Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 09:50:53AM -0400 Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk According to Bryan J. Smith: > [Off-topic] As I said, VALinux seems to be squarely behind Ext3 for > kernel 2.2 ... > http://www.idg.net/go.cgi?id=461437 [Disclaimer: I work for VA as kernel coordinator, but I don't speak for VA corporate.] Well, we aren't really "behind" ext3, any more than we're "behind" any other filesystem. We certainly did choose to use ext3 in our NAS product. But given that [1] NAS has to have rock-solid NFS service, [2] ext2 is the best-tested FS for NFS, and [3] ext3 is based on ext2, it seemed a natural choice. NAS isn't our only product, and even NAS could conceivably switch to another filesystem, given cause. We will evaluate the other journaled filesystems as resources allow. I'd like to set up a four-way test -- reiser, ext3, xfs, and jfs (IBM). I'd like to use each of them for [1] root, [2] /tmp, [3] other local usage, and [3] NFS export. Considering RAID and other factors, it won't be an easy test to do; don't hold your breath. :-( > Are they waiting on the Ext3 port to 2.4? Or are they waiting on > RedHat to adopt XFS? Or are they evaluating XFS now? We aren't neophiles ... at least, our managers aren't ... so we don't deploy stuff just because it exists. And if you check our kernel, you'll find that it's essentially based on SuSE's kernel, not Red Hat's. We'll deploy whatever will serve our customers best. -- Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - "We have no fuel on board, plus or minus 8 kilograms." -- NEAR tech