Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 02:08:15 -0700 Received: from hermes.mixx.net ([212.84.196.2]:52754 "HELO hermes.mixx.net") by oss.sgi.com with SMTP id ; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 02:07:45 -0700 Received: from mate.bln.innominate.de (cerberus.innominate.de [212.84.234.251]) by hermes.mixx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A69BDF844 for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 11:07:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mate.bln.innominate.de (Postfix, from userid 9) id 2B4842CA6B; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 11:07:02 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Graichen Reply-To: Thomas Graichen X-Newsgroups: innominate.list.sgi.xfs Subject: xfs & ppc & egcs Date: 27 Aug 2000 09:07:02 GMT Organization: innominate AG, Berlin, Germany Lines: 21 Distribution: local Message-ID: Reply-To: thomas.graichen@innominate.de X-Trace: mate.bln.innominate.de 967367222 24330 10.0.0.69 (27 Aug 2000 09:07:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@innominate.de User-Agent: tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.16-local (i586)) To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-xfs-outgoing just installed an egcs on the ppc machine and rebuilt the xfs kernel with it (4 files did not compile due to assembler problems - maybe i need to downgrade the binutils too for which i don't have the diskspace right now - but lets hope those 4 files are not that important ... they are btw.: xfs_log.c, xfs_trans_buf.c, page_buf.c, page_buf_io.c - i recompiled those 4 files with gcc 2.95 then) the final result of this little experiment was: i get the same problems on the ppc as with gcc 2.95 - so it looks like the problems are more generic and not directly related to gcc vs. egcs ... will try to investigate all this again deeper in the next days (i think i will have a closer look at xfs_db and how it works - to see how exactly the on disk structure looks like - is this a good idea ?) t -- thomas.graichen@innominate.de technical director innominate AG clustering & security networking people tel: +49.30.308806-13 fax: -77 http://innominate.de