Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 23:01:14 -0700 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:5469 "EHLO deliverator.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 23:00:57 -0700 Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via SMTP id WAA24715 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 22:53:22 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (nathans@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com) Received: from wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com (wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.55.135]) by larry.melbourne.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA15516; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 15:59:39 +1000 Received: (from nathans@localhost) by wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/980728.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA13740; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 15:59:38 +1000 (EST) From: "Nathan Scott" Message-Id: <10008131559.ZM13950@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 15:59:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: Claudio Baeza R "problem: can I not build xfs-cmd in last CVS (08/12/00)" (Aug 13, 1:08pm) References: X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail) To: Claudio Baeza R , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: problem: can I not build xfs-cmd in last CVS (08/12/00) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-xfs-outgoing hi, On Aug 13, 1:08pm, Claudio Baeza R wrote: > Subject: problem: can I not build xfs-cmd in last CVS (08/12/00) > > Hello, > > I have problem to successfully build xfs-cmd. > ... > Which definitions would have to use? xfs_fsops.h or xfs_fs.h ? > xfs_fs.h is the right one. I've checked in the fix - thanks. -- Nathan