Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 15:00:51 -0700 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:49969 "EHLO deliverator.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 15:00:46 -0700 Received: from relay1.corp.sgi.com (spindle.corp.sgi.com [198.29.75.13]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id OAA14203 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:55:54 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (trev@sgi.com) Received: from cromlech.corp.sgi.com (cromlech.corp.sgi.com [150.166.181.83]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA31435; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 15:00:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cromlech.corp.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/980728.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA19029; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:58:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <396500EB.C4D9A6FE@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 14:58:03 -0700 From: Trevor Hurst Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5 IP32) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nathan Scott CC: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: make on xfs commands.. References: <3963A20A.7DAD6487@sgi.com> <3964F00B.C71393FE@thebarn.com> <10007070745.ZM21335@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-xfs-outgoing Nathan Scott wrote: > > hi, > > On Jul 7, 6:50am, Russell Cattelan wrote: > > Subject: Re: make on xfs commands.. > > Trevor Hurst wrote: > > > > > > Any ideas what might be wrong? > > > > No clue > > Try updating your tree. > > > > I'll forward this to the list... see if anybody else might have an idea. > > > > > > > > cc -DXFS_BIG_FILES=1 -DXFS_BIG_FILESYSTEMS=1 -D_KMEMUSER -DSTATIC=static > > > -DSIM -I../sim/src -I.. -I../../../linux/include > > > -I../../../linux/fs/xfs/ -I../../../linux/fs/xfs/pseudo-inc -D_KERNEL > > > -funsigned-char -c xfs_mkfs.c -o xfs_mkfs.o > > > xfs_mkfs.c:351: `MAXTRRES_B9_I8_D9_V1' undeclared here (not in a > > > function) > > > xfs_mkfs.c:351: initializer element for `max_trres_v1[0][0]' is not > > > constant > > > xfs_mkfs.c:352: `MAXTRRES_B10_I8_D10_V1' undeclared here (not in a > > > function) > > > xfs_mkfs.c:352: initializer element for `max_trres_v1[1][0]' is not > > > constant > > > xfs_mkfs.c:352: `MAXTRRES_B10_I9_D10_V1' undeclared here (not in a > > > function) > > > xfs_mkfs.c:352: initializer element for `max_trres_v1[1][1]' is not > > > constant > > > xfs_mkfs.c:353: `MAXTRRES_B11_I8_D11_V1' undeclared here (not in a > > > function) > > > > > these #defines come from maxtrres.h which should exist in > your cmd/xfs/mkfs directory at the time you're building xfs_mkfs.c > - maxtrres.h is generated using cmd/xfs/maxtrres/xfs_maxtrres, > so I guess you'd see these errors if that header hadn't been > generated or if you didn't have the #include "maxtrres.h" line at > the top of xfs_mkfs.c ... does the header exist? > > cheers. > > -- > Nathan Ah... Yes, it does, however, I think the problem is that it is of 0 byte length.. uggh.. Looks like I will wipe out the tree and pull down a fresh one and try again. Not sure how the header file got to be empty, does this seem strange? Thanks for the tips! Cheers, -- Trev -- Trevor Hurst Senior Systems Administrator _ Server Operations/Corp. IS ___ __ _(_) Silicon Graphics / __|/ _` | | Office Ph: 650.933.6144 \__ \ (_| | | e-mail: trev@sgi.com |___/\__, |_| pager: trev_p@pager.sgi.com |___/ -- We are Pentium of Borg. You will be approximated. Division is futile! -- Unknown