Received:  by oss.sgi.com id <S553899AbRBLSoh>;
	Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:44:37 -0800
Received: from [208.155.65.221] ([208.155.65.221]:14867 "EHLO
        www.cgsoftware.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id <S553897AbRBLSoK>;
	Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:44:10 -0800
Received: from localhost (dan@localhost)
	by www.cgsoftware.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1CIhK329165;
	Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:43:31 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: www.cgsoftware.com: dan owned process doing -bs
Date:   Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:43:20 -0500 (EST)
From:   Daniel Berlin <dberlin@redhat.com>
X-X-Sender:  <dan@www.cgsoftware.com>
To:     "Ross A. Towle" <rat@cchkms.engr.sgi.com>
cc:     Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, <pro64-support@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Problems with -Ofast
In-Reply-To: <10102120956.ZM7957@cchkms.engr.sgi.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0102121342240.28911-100000@www.cgsoftware.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing



On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Ross A. Towle wrote:

> The development of ipa-link as a modification to gnu ld is very
> easy.  There are are small number of changes.  There were no
> engineering problems.  Just getting the changes into the GNU
> source tree is the sticking point.

Well, I searched the binutils mailing list for "ipa", "ipa-link",
"ipa_link", and got no hits.

Did you ever actually submit the changes to the binutils mailing list?

>
> -Ross
>