Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 02:20:52 -0800 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:61707 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by oss.sgi.com with SMTP id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 02:20:31 -0800 Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [213.95.15.136]) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E2D1E0AC; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:20:29 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:19:45 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: "Ross A. Towle" Cc: pro64-support@oss.sgi.com, Wayne Vieira Subject: Re: Problems with -Ofast Message-ID: <20010212111945.B21435@gruyere.muc.suse.de> References: <200102120534.VAA06579@cchkms.engr.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200102120534.VAA06579@cchkms.engr.sgi.com>; from rat@cchkms.engr.sgi.com on Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 09:34:37PM -0800 Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 09:34:37PM -0800, Ross A. Towle wrote: > -Ofast turns on IPA. IPA requires the use of a modified linker > which is called ipa_link. This has not been part of the Pro64 > releases. We have been trying for over 9 months to get the changes > included in the GNU linker. Due to the lack of success we will > be including the sources for ipa_link with the upcoming release > 0.13 of Pro64. I'm curious: what were the main problems in porting to BFD/GNU ld? -Andi