Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Wed, 02 Mar 2005 03:01:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from www1.cdi.cz (IDENT:8@www1.cdi.cz [194.213.194.49]) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j22B1hJx015537 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 03:01:43 -0800 Received: from mail by www1.cdi.cz with spamc (Exim 4.31) id 1D6Rbq-0001gk-76; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 12:01:42 +0100 Received: from ip-85-160-89-87.eurotel.cz ([85.160.89.87] helo=devix) by www1.cdi.cz with asmtp (Exim 4.31) id 1D6Rbn-0001g0-8n; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 12:01:40 +0100 Received: from devix ([127.0.0.1]) by devix with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #8) id 1D6Rbc-0006YJ-00; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 12:01:28 +0100 Message-ID: <42259D08.1060509@cdi.cz> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 12:01:28 +0100 From: Martin Devera User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: cs, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick McHardy CC: netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: spin_trylock in qdisc_restart, OOPS, IMQ problem ? References: <42258DC6.9030109@cdi.cz> <4225955E.7030306@trash.net> In-Reply-To: <4225955E.7030306@trash.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/737/Mon Feb 28 22:22:18 2005 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 2228 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: devik@cdi.cz Precedence: bulk X-list: netdev Patrick McHardy wrote: > Martin Devera wrote: > >> I've seen some notes in 2.6.11rc3 changelog from Patrick about >> issues similar to my OOPS (attached). >> Patrick, does the oops ring some bells at your side ? > > > The fixes in 2.6.11-rc3 fixed some new bugs introduced in -rc2. This > looks like a problem with non-linear skbs, this patch from Rusty may > help: > > http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/cset@41db69b71pSJFXrCtc56tffafab_JQ?nav=index.html|src/net/|src/net|src/net/ipv4|src/net/ipv4/netfilter|related/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_nat_proto_tcp.c Thanks, it seems so, I'll test it. By the way, have you an idea what is going with that spinlocking errors I described in the last mail ? Martin