Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:29:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com (e34.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.132]) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j1RJSo15020912 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:28:56 -0800 Received: from d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.107]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j1RJShMN530730 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:28:43 -0500 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j1RJShXo143472 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:28:43 -0700 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1RJSh1N029386 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:28:43 -0700 Received: from sig-9-65-48-170.mts.ibm.com (sig-9-65-48-170.mts.ibm.com [9.65.48.170]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1RJSghG029382; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:28:42 -0700 From: Jon Mason Organization: IBM To: Richard Dawe Subject: Re: [PATCH]: r8169: Expose hardware stats via ethtool Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:28:41 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 Cc: Francois Romieu , netdev@oss.sgi.com References: <42208D83.80803@phekda.gotadsl.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <42208D83.80803@phekda.gotadsl.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502271328.41747.jdmason@us.ibm.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/730/Sat Feb 26 17:56:54 2005 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 2095 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: jdmason@us.ibm.com Precedence: bulk X-list: netdev Content-Length: 494 Lines: 15 On Saturday 26 February 2005 08:53 am, Richard Dawe wrote: > Hi Francois and Jon! > > Please find attached a patch that adds the hardware statistics ethtool > operations to the r8169 driver. It's against 2.6.11-rc5. I tested it on my amd64 system and it works great. I saw the same error if stats were gathered with the interface was down. As a sanity check, I preformed the same test on e1000 and it does not have this error. Not sure the significance of that. Thanks Richard! Jon