Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:56:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from fr.zoreil.com (electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com [213.41.134.224]) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j1O0txwq009253 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:56:00 -0800 Received: from electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by fr.zoreil.com (8.13.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id j1O0qis8003504; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 01:52:44 +0100 Received: (from romieu@localhost) by electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1O0qdgj003503; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 01:52:39 +0100 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 01:52:39 +0100 From: Francois Romieu To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Netdev , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [BK PATCHES] 2.6.x r8169 update Message-ID: <20050224005239.GA2599@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> References: <421D141C.4030602@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <421D141C.4030602@pobox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Organisation: Land of Sunshine Inc. X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/722/Wed Feb 23 15:32:10 2005 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 2009 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: romieu@fr.zoreil.com Precedence: bulk X-list: netdev Content-Length: 486 Lines: 14 Jeff Garzik : [...] > Agree it needs fixing, but I actually think the rx-offset stuff is more > urgent than this. For the future, it would be useful for both of us to > have separate r8169-fixes and r8169-cleanups queues. Do you have a synonym/pointer for the rx-offset stuff ? It will help me to rework the flow if you can describe in a few words what you expect wrt fixes/cleanups issue. Don't be shy, I won't use it as a contract set in stone :o) -- Ueimor