Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:00:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1.fuse.net (mail-out1.fuse.net [216.68.8.174]) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j0VLxwsw005036 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:59:58 -0800 Received: from gx4.fuse.net ([66.42.247.210]) by smtp1.fuse.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050131215755.HEHC18019.smtp1.fuse.net@gx4.fuse.net> for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:57:55 -0500 Received: from chinchilla.toadis.porkis ([66.42.247.210]) by gx4.fuse.net (InterMail vG.1.02.00.02 201-2136-104-102-20041210) with ESMTP id <20050131215811.POOC13012.gx4.fuse.net@chinchilla.toadis.porkis> for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:58:11 -0500 Received: from gerbil.toadis.porkis (localhost.localdomain) [192.168.10.2] by chinchilla.toadis.porkis with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CvjaG-0002Yy-00; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:59:48 -0500 Received: by localhost.localdomain (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:59:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:59:48 -0500 From: "Dale E. Martin" To: netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: where is the proper place for r8169 bug reports? Message-ID: <20050131215948.GA23289@gerbil.toadis.porkis> References: <20050131181508.GA15908@gerbil.toadis.porkis> <20050131214951.GA13217@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050131214951.GA13217@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/650/Sun Jan 2 19:00:02 2005 clamav-milter version 0.80j on 127.0.0.1 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 1129 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: dale@the-martins.org Precedence: bulk X-list: netdev Content-Length: 742 Lines: 21 > You can send info here and open a PR at bugzilla.kernel.org. OK. In general what I'm seeing is transmit timeout error that is locking the machine up when I try to run at gigabit speed. The board is a "Zonet" brand card, hooked to a Netgear 8 port gigabit switch. The same card worked in another machine so I'm guessing that the board isn't a paper weight at least. > If you are using a 2.95.x compiler (wild guess), it would be well advised > to upgrade. Hmmm, OK. I'm running Debian stable so that is what cc defaults to. I'll recompile with 3.3 and see if the problems go away. It could easily explain the difference between machines too. Thanks, Dale -- Dale E. Martin - dale@the-martins.org http://the-martins.org/~dmartin