Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:25:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk (IDENT:93@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j0VIPAhB015503 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:25:11 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=logos.cnet) by parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CvgET-0007aZ-RL; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:25:06 +0000 Received: by logos.cnet (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6C0E9122EBB; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:24:31 -0200 (BRST) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:24:31 -0200 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Bukie Mabayoje Cc: sfeldma@pobox.com, David =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E4rdeman?= , Michael Gernoth , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: 2.4.29, e100 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad Message-ID: <20050131152431.GA14176@logos.cnet> References: <20050130171849.GA3354@hardeman.nu> <1107143255.18167.428.camel@localhost.localdomain> <41FDB2D3.5CBD6F7D@gte.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41FDB2D3.5CBD6F7D@gte.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/650/Sun Jan 2 19:00:02 2005 clamav-milter version 0.80j on 127.0.0.1 X-Virus-Status: Clean Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by oss.sgi.com id j0VIPAhB015503 X-archive-position: 1110 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com Precedence: bulk X-list: netdev Content-Length: 1015 Lines: 25 On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 08:23:47PM -0800, Bukie Mabayoje wrote: > > Scott Feldman wrote: > > > On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 09:18, David Härdeman wrote: > > > I experience the same problems as reported by Michael Gernoth when > > > sending a WOL-packet to computer with a e100 NIC which is already > > > powered on. > > > > I didn't look at the 2.4 case, but for 2.6, it seems e100 was enabling > > PME wakeup during probe. PME shouldn't be enabled while the system is > > up. I suspect the assertion of PME while the system is up is what's > > causing problems. This patch moves PME wakeup enabling to either > > suspend or shutdown. > > > > David, would you give this patch a try? Make sure the system still > > wakes from a magic packet if suspended or shut down, and doesn't cause > > kacpid to go crazy if system is running. If it helps for 2.6, perhaps > > someone can look into 2.4 to see if there is something similar going on > > This issue was reported on 2.4. Can any of you guys test v2.6, please?