Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:19:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from arena (test.estpak.ee [194.126.115.47]) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j0V8JYkF024220 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:19:35 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=arena) by arena with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CvWn2-0000jm-Qx; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:20:08 +0200 From: Hasso Tepper To: hadi@znyx.com Subject: Re: dummy as IMQ replacement Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:20:08 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, Nguyen Dinh Nam , Remus , Andre Tomt , syrius.ml@no-log.org, Andy Furniss , Damion de Soto References: <1107123123.8021.80.camel@jzny.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1107123123.8021.80.camel@jzny.localdomain> Organization: Elion Enterprises Ltd. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501311020.08337.hasso@estpak.ee> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/650/Sun Jan 2 19:00:02 2005 clamav-milter version 0.80j on 127.0.0.1 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 1059 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: hasso@estpak.ee Precedence: bulk X-list: netdev Content-Length: 479 Lines: 15 Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > 2) Allows for queueing incoming traffic for shaping instead of > dropping. I am not aware of any study that shows policing is > worse than shaping in achieving the end goal of rate control. > I would be interested if anyone is experimenting. Nevertheless, > this is still an alternative as opposed to making a system wide > ingress change. Policing didn't work with IPv6 last time I checked. -- Hasso Tepper Elion Enterprises Ltd. WAN administrator