Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Mon, 31 Jan 2005 02:01:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from yue.st-paulia.net (yue.linux-ipv6.org [203.178.140.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j0VA142x030483 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 02:01:05 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yue.st-paulia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FBF33CC2; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:01:58 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:01:57 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20050131.190157.42878368.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> To: Christian.Tschudin@unibas.ch Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Subject: Re: PROBLEM: nd_tbl not a public symbol in net/ipv6/ndisc.c From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= In-Reply-To: References: <20050131.172022.93845025.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Organization: USAGI Project X-URL: http://www.yoshifuji.org/%7Ehideaki/ X-Fingerprint: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA X-PGP-Key-URL: http://www.yoshifuji.org/%7Ehideaki/hideaki@yoshifuji.org.asc X-Face: "5$Al-.M>NJ%a'@hhZdQm:."qn~PA^gq4o*>iCFToq*bAi#4FRtx}enhuQKz7fNqQz\BYU] $~O_5m-9'}MIs`XGwIEscw;e5b>n"B_?j/AkL~i/MEaZBLP X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.1 (AOI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/650/Sun Jan 2 19:00:02 2005 clamav-milter version 0.80j on 127.0.0.1 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 1064 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Precedence: bulk X-list: netdev Content-Length: 721 Lines: 18 In article (at Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:16:29 +0100 (MET)), Christian Tschudin says: > We have implemented an underlay network layer protocol. > This means that we present to the IP stack a subnet illusion > while doing wireless multihop forwarding underneath. > To this end we need to set and unset entries in the neighbor > table, because we are actively managing neighbors. Ok, but basically, we do not export it unless it is really used. We may do if it is necessary when you merge it. BTW, for your purpose, we may export ndisc_lookup() or something instead of nd_tbl itself. Anyway, I'd like to know the usage (code). --yoshfuji