Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:56:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx03.cybersurf.com (mx03.cybersurf.com [209.197.145.106])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j061uLCC006577
	for <netdev@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:56:21 -0800
Received: from mail.cyberus.ca ([209.197.145.21])
	by mx03.cybersurf.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1CmY7W-00076f-U4
	for netdev@oss.sgi.com; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 08:56:10 -0500
Received: from cpe0030ab124d2f-cm014500000962.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([24.103.99.32] helo=[10.0.0.9])
	by mail.cyberus.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 1CmY7M-0000cy-6a; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 08:56:00 -0500
Subject: Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver.
From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca
To: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
        Thomas Spatzier <thomas.spatzier@de.ibm.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Hasso Tepper <hasso@estpak.ee>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
        Tommy Christensen <tommy.christensen@tpack.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501051408330.27046@hibernia.jakma.org>
References: 
	 <OFB7F7E23F.EFB88418-ONC1256F7E.0031769E-C1256F7E.003270AD@de.ibm.com>
	 <1104764710.1048.580.camel@jzny.localdomain>  <41DB26A6.2070008@pobox.com>
	 <1104895169.1117.63.camel@jzny.localdomain>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501050627050.27046@hibernia.jakma.org>
	 <1104931011.1118.134.camel@jzny.localdomain>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501051408330.27046@hibernia.jakma.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: jamalopolous
Message-Id: <1105019757.2314.16.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 
Date: 06 Jan 2005 08:55:58 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/650/Sun Jan  2 19:00:02 2005
	clamav-milter version 0.80j
	on 127.0.0.1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-archive-position: 13458
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
X-original-sender: hadi@cyberus.ca
Precedence: bulk
X-list: netdev

On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 09:29, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, jamal wrote:

[..]
> Sorry, wires crossed re "new behaviour". The "new new" behaviour in 
> the patch as you describe would be perfect.
> 
> PS: Another issue, could we have kernel space IP fragmentation for 
> IP_HDRINCL sockets please? We currently have to implement 
> fragmentation ourselves, which seems silly given that kernel already 
> has this functionality.

I will let some other fireman grab this bait ;-> 
If not i will revisit it after a unknown/random timeout.

cheers,
jamal