Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:36:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ftp.linux-mips.org (mail.linux-mips.org [62.254.210.162])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i68DaQgi017483
	for <netdev@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 06:36:27 -0700
Received: from mx01.cybersurf.com ([IPv6:::ffff:209.197.145.104]:44453 "EHLO
	mx01.cybersurf.com") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP
	id <S8225786AbUGHNgZ>; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 14:36:25 +0100
Received: from mail.cyberus.ca ([209.197.145.21])
	by mx01.cybersurf.com with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 1BiZ4W-0006bP-PM
	for netdev@linux-mips.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 09:36:20 -0400
Received: from cpe0030ab124d2f-cm014500000962.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([24.103.99.32] helo=[10.0.0.9])
	by mail.cyberus.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 1BiZ4S-0005IK-Or; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 09:36:17 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] update to network emulation QOS scheduler
From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>, Catalin BOIE <util@deuroconsult.ro>,
        netdev@oss.sgi.com
In-Reply-To: <20040707142216.7c9763c3@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net>
References: <20040701113312.43cfe6c5@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net>
	 <20040702134437.5891e998@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net>
	 <1088824432.1043.271.camel@jzny.localdomain>
	 <20040707111055.32ebb25b@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net>
	 <1089226667.1027.411.camel@jzny.localdomain>
	 <20040707135831.4c98dd51@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net>
	 <1089234699.1026.448.camel@jzny.localdomain>
	 <20040707142216.7c9763c3@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: jamalopolis
Message-Id: <1089293774.1349.118.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 
Date: 	08 Jul 2004 09:36:14 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-archive-position: 6803
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
X-original-sender: hadi@cyberus.ca
Precedence: bulk
X-list: netdev
Content-Length: 566
Lines: 18


I have taken out lartc from the CC; it keeps bouncing emails back to me.

On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 17:22, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

> Actually, the problem only occurs if burst is set large (like 2mb).
> I think it gets stuck waiting for that much data.

Sounds like a bug. If you have the exact setup description i can chase
it. 
What about CBQ, HTB, H-FSC?
The other way to do it is actually put a router next to a localy
generated traffic. I have used this many times in the past
(a sample is at: ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2884.txt section 4.1)

cheers,
jamal