Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:51:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i2H1owKO017698 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:50:58 -0800 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2H1or4b022787; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:50:53 -0500 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i2H1orj12407; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:50:53 -0500 Received: from cheetah.davemloft.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i2H1od2x022761; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:50:39 -0500 Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:50:52 -0800 From: "David S. Miller" To: Andi Kleen Cc: shemminger@osdl.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: network delay simulation Message-Id: <20040316175052.556d5c22.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20040317000048.10d9f52c.ak@suse.de> References: <20040316151058.3cc2fa28@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <20040317000048.10d9f52c.ak@suse.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: "_;p5u5aPsO,_Vsx"^v-pEq09'CU4&Dc1$fQExov$62l60cgCc%FnIwD=.UF^a>?5'9Kn[;433QFVV9M..2eN.@4ZWPGbdi<=?[:T>y?SD(R*-3It"Vj:)"dP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 4064 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: davem@redhat.com Precedence: bulk X-list: netdev Content-Length: 299 Lines: 8 On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:00:48 +0100 Andi Kleen wrote: > iirc there was a 2.4 port of NistNet. Porting it to 2.6 is probably > not that much work. nistnet works, but even akpm remembers it as pretty grotty, who knows maybe the most recent 2.4.x variant was much better, but I doubt it.