Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Thu, 27 Nov 2003 17:15:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Cantor.suse.de (ns.suse.de [195.135.220.2])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id hAS1ElTa020850
	for <netdev@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 17:14:48 -0800
Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [195.135.221.8])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 00D501862BAF; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 02:14:42 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 02:14:39 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
Cc: davem@redhat.com, xose@wanadoo.es, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip
Message-Id: <20031128021439.0f48de70.ak@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <1069941123.1027.6.camel@jzny.localdomain>
References: <3FC3FB99.70700@wanadoo.es>
	<20031127010324.061cac3b.davem@redhat.com>
	<20031127122021.3ac80a86.ak@suse.de>
	<20031127122642.046d07ce.ak@suse.de>
	<1069941123.1027.6.camel@jzny.localdomain>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-archive-position: 1744
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
X-original-sender: ak@suse.de
Precedence: bulk
X-list: netdev
Content-Length: 276
Lines: 12

On 27 Nov 2003 08:52:03 -0500
jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> wrote:

> Andi, is this the driver you were playing those neat tricks with
> getting rid of some of the nastiness in eth_type_trans()?

Yep.

I didn't attempt to NAPIize it though. Also it is still somewhat buggy.

-Andi