Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Thu, 27 Nov 2003 04:04:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from Cantor.suse.de (ns.suse.de [195.135.220.2]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id hARC3RTa018464 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 04:03:28 -0800 Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30BC184DECD; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 12:26:43 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 12:26:42 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Andi Kleen Cc: davem@redhat.com, xose@wanadoo.es, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip Message-Id: <20031127122642.046d07ce.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20031127122021.3ac80a86.ak@suse.de> References: <3FC3FB99.70700@wanadoo.es> <20031127010324.061cac3b.davem@redhat.com> <20031127122021.3ac80a86.ak@suse.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 1719 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: ak@suse.de Precedence: bulk X-list: netdev On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 12:20:21 +0100 Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 01:03:24 -0800 > "David S. Miller" wrote: > > > On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 02:02:17 +0100 > > Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~wpaul/Level1/LXT1001SRM.pdf > > > > Looks mildly interesting, I might be inspired to cook up > > a fresh driver :) > > Actually there is an old vendor driver for the lxt1001 > (but it is quite ugly and will probably need some porting for 2.6 > or even 2.4) > > I've been also slowly working on a new driver, but still nothing > releasable. BTW I should add - the chipset is really dead. Intel has bought LevelOne and killed it. You are unlikely to be able to get any new cards for it. But it is an quite interesting architecture (with some complete stupidity and some interesting features) and rather different from a classic Tulip/AMD like network card. -Andi