Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Mon, 13 Oct 2003 07:59:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.osdl.org (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id h9DEx825023860 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 07:59:09 -0700 Received: from dragon.pdx.osdl.net (dragon.pdx.osdl.net [172.20.1.27]) by mail.osdl.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h9DEwno27731; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 07:58:50 -0700 Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 07:49:29 -0700 From: "Randy.Dunlap" To: Elmer Cc: noah@caltech.edu, netdev@oss.sgi.com, davem@redhat.com Subject: Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7) Message-Id: <20031013074929.0edb73be.rddunlap@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20031012201316.7ecf73c8.rddunlap@osdl.org> Organization: OSDL X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: +5V?h'hZQPB9kW Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 762 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: rddunlap@osdl.org Precedence: bulk X-list: netdev On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 13:31:30 +0200 (EET) Elmer wrote: | | | arlan.c is ok without arlan-proc.c | as init_arlan_proc is in arlan-proc.c, it shoult be | OK, as long as radio parameters are saved into cards ROM. | | I have forgot a lot about that code, of course. Hi Elmer, Sure, I understand the last comment. I don't quite understand the first paragraph though. Could we try again? Currently arlan.c + arlan-proc.c does not build if CONFIG_PROC_FS=n. The Makefile always builds arlan-main.o and arlan-proc.o. Are you saying that this is incorrect? Should arlan-proc.o only be built/used when CONFIG_PROC_FS=y? Thanks. -- ~Randy