Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:52:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from caduceus.fm.intel.com (fmr02.intel.com [192.55.52.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5DNqK2x022768 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:52:23 -0700 Received: from petasus.fm.intel.com (petasus.fm.intel.com [10.1.192.37]) by caduceus.fm.intel.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6/d: outer.mc,v 1.66 2003/05/22 21:17:36 rfjohns1 Exp $) with ESMTP id h5DNiK819690 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 23:44:20 GMT Received: from orsmsxvs041.jf.intel.com (orsmsxvs041.jf.intel.com [192.168.65.54]) by petasus.fm.intel.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6/d: inner.mc,v 1.35 2003/05/22 21:18:01 rfjohns1 Exp $) with SMTP id h5DNjZS15947 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 23:45:35 GMT Received: from orsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.60]) by orsmsxvs041.jf.intel.com (NAVGW 2.5.2.11) with SMTP id M2003061316521816470 ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:52:18 -0700 Received: from orsmsx402.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.208]) by orsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:52:19 -0700 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 Subject: RE: e1000 performance hack for ppc64 (Power4) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:52:18 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: e1000 performance hack for ppc64 (Power4) Thread-Index: AcMyAnKU0XzTrYR3SGmq2WX57ZZcjAABAyWw From: "Feldman, Scott" To: "Anton Blanchard" , "David S. Miller" Cc: , , , , , , , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jun 2003 23:52:19.0006 (UTC) FILETIME=[D32425E0:01C33206] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by oss.sgi.com id h5DNqK2x022768 X-archive-position: 3221 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: scott.feldman@intel.com Precedence: bulk X-list: netdev > > Why not instead find out if it's possible to have the e1000 > > fetch the entire cache line where the first byte of the > > packet resides? Even ancient designes like SunHME do that. > > Rusty and I were wondering why the e1000 didnt do that exact thing. > > Scott: is it possible to enable such a thing? I thought the answer was no, so I double checked with a couple of hardware guys, and the answer is still no. -scott