Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Mon, 14 Apr 2003 09:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.osdl.org (air-2.osdl.org [65.172.181.6])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h3EGuSFu019900
	for <netdev@oss.sgi.com>; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 09:56:29 -0700
Received: from dragon.pdx.osdl.net (dragon.pdx.osdl.net [172.20.1.27])
	by mail.osdl.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h3EGpPW19705;
	Mon, 14 Apr 2003 09:51:25 -0700
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 09:50:30 -0700
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=B5=C8=C6=A3=B1=D1=CC=C0?=
 <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: davem@redhat.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
   yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface
Message-Id: <20030414095030.50ad9652.rddunlap@osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030415.014047.39346510.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
References: <20030414080347.0af818f7.rddunlap@osdl.org>
	<20030415.002915.71906095.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
	<20030414.090610.117741299.davem@redhat.com>
	<20030415.014047.39346510.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Organization: OSDL
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by oss.sgi.com id h3EGuSFu019900
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)
X-archive-position: 2225
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
X-original-sender: rddunlap@osdl.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: netdev
Content-Length: 556
Lines: 19

On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 01:40:47 +0900 (JST) YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / µÈÆ£±ÑÌÀ <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> wrote:

| In article <20030414.090610.117741299.davem@redhat.com> (at Mon, 14 Apr 2003 09:06:10 -0700 (PDT)), "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> says:
| 
| > So we'd then have /proc/net/dev_snmp6/{lo,eth0,eth1} etc.
| > 
| > Ok?
| 
| Okay.  I'd like to see ifIndex in that file, too.

Yes, sounds good.

Is this something that you plan to extract from the USAGI Linux 2.4
patches and submit for 2.5, or should I continue with my patches?

Thanks,
--
~Randy