Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Wed, 08 Jan 2003 12:21:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dns.toxicfilms.tv (dns.toxicfilms.tv [150.254.37.24])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id h08KLT3v018323
	for <netdev@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 12:21:30 -0800
Received: by dns.toxicfilms.tv (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id F03928E2AF; Wed,  8 Jan 2003 21:27:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dns.toxicfilms.tv (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D9C2123637; Wed,  8 Jan 2003 21:27:02 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 21:27:02 +0100 (CET)
From: Maciej Soltysiak <solt@dns.toxicfilms.tv>
To: Andrew McGregor <andrew@indranet.co.nz>
Cc: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@fabbione.net>,
   Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>, <netdev@oss.sgi.com>,
   <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs
In-Reply-To: <78180000.1042055993@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301082122190.32244-100000@dns.toxicfilms.tv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-archive-position: 1493
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
X-original-sender: solt@dns.toxicfilms.tv
Precedence: bulk
X-list: netdev

> Probably on the server's side it got an ICMP Host Unreachable or two as
> some router updated its tables, and decided to close the connection.
Sounds reasonable to me. Could it mean that this router that we are
talking about is simply slow or overloaded ?

Maciej