Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Wed, 09 Oct 2002 16:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pizda.ninka.net (IDENT:root@pizda.ninka.net [216.101.162.242]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g99NqKtG015571 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:52:20 -0700 Received: from localhost (IDENT:davem@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pizda.ninka.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA29366; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:45:04 -0700 Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 16:45:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20021009.164504.28085695.davem@redhat.com> To: sekiya@sfc.wide.ad.jp Cc: dfawcus@cisco.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, usagi@linux-ipv6.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: References: <20021010002902.A3803@edi-view1.cisco.com> <20021009.162438.82081593.davem@redhat.com> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 607 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: davem@redhat.com Precedence: bulk X-list: netdev From: Yuji Sekiya Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:41:52 +0900 The reason we change the prefix length from /10 to /64 is following spec and adapting other imprementations. I think Derek's explanation shows that the specification allows the /10 behavior. Also, I suspect that since Derek works for Cisco, some "other implementations" behave how he describes. :-)