Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Thu, 03 Oct 2002 01:05:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pizda.ninka.net (IDENT:root@pizda.ninka.net [216.101.162.242]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g93850tG005128 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 01:05:01 -0700 Received: from localhost (IDENT:davem@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pizda.ninka.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA28473; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 00:56:56 -0700 Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 00:56:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20021003.005656.102625653.davem@redhat.com> To: jmorris@intercode.com.au Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, mbp@samba.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, ak@muc.de, netdev@oss.sgi.com, Alan.Cox@linux.org Subject: Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: References: <1033388585.16337.9.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 489 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: davem@redhat.com Precedence: bulk X-list: netdev From: James Morris Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:30:44 +1000 (EST) On 30 Sep 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > Well if Dave can't test it and isnt doing any 2.2 who wants to be the > 2.2 networking maintainer ? I'd be willing to give it a go. So be it.