Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6MMuxRw007824
	for <netdev-outgoing@oss.sgi.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:56:59 -0700
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.3/Submit) id g6MMux6W007823
	for netdev-outgoing; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:56:59 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: oss.sgi.com: majordomo set sender to owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com using -f
Received: from sex.inr.ac.ru (sex.inr.ac.ru [193.233.7.165])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g6MMurRw007814
	for <netdev@oss.sgi.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:56:54 -0700
Received: (from kuznet@localhost) by sex.inr.ac.ru (8.6.13/ANK) id CAA14506; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 02:57:14 +0400
From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Message-Id: <200207222257.CAA14506@sex.inr.ac.ru>
Subject: Re: Frozen machine with adding a tc filter
To: ahu@ds9a.nl (bert hubert)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 02:57:14 +0400 (MSD)
Cc: albertogli@telpin.COM.AR, netdev@oss.sgi.com
In-Reply-To: <20020722212111.GA22916@outpost.ds9a.nl> from "bert hubert" at Jul 22, 2 11:21:11 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,NO_REAL_NAME version=2.20
X-Spam-Level: 
Sender: owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

Hello!

> I also reported this

Sorry, I do not remeber this.

>		 - should tc check this? Or the kernel?

The kernel. This funny feature was supposed to disappear ages ago, in 2.2.
It did not, hence, it did not. :-)


> Aren't the last 2 lines meant to prevent this from happening?

They are.


> Please tell me your ideas,

Well, before all figure out where it deadlocks.

Alexey