Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id fBBGhRk29571 for netdev-outgoing; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 08:43:27 -0800 Received: from enterprise.atl.lmco.com (mail.atl.external.lmco.com [192.35.37.50]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id fBBGhPo29555 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 08:43:25 -0800 Received: from misty.atl.lmco.com (misty [166.17.242.243]) by enterprise.atl.lmco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCAEAC1CF4 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:43:17 -0500 (EST) Received: (from cwinters@localhost) by misty.atl.lmco.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id fBBFhGo08220 for netdev@oss.sgi.com; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:43:16 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:43:16 -0500 From: Chuck Winters To: netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: kfree_skb Message-ID: <20011211104316.A8195@atl.lmco.com> Mail-Followup-To: netdev@oss.sgi.com References: <20011210133840.A1534@atl.lmco.com> <20011210210842.A896@conectiva.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011210210842.A896@conectiva.com.br>; from acme@conectiva.com.br on Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:08:42PM -0200 Sender: owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 440 Lines: 11 On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:08:42PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 01:38:40PM -0500, Chuck Winters escreveu: > > Can bad things happen in 2.2 if you kfree_skb more than once? > > not if it matches the number of skb_get on it (or other operations that > bump the skb refcount, dunno if it exists in 2.2, I'm looking at 2.4, that > bumps the refcount at least in skb_recv_datagram) 8) > > - Arnaldo Thanks