Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f7I1j0g18976 for netdev-outgoing; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:45:00 -0700 Received: from netbank.com.br (IDENT:postfix@garrincha.netbank.com.br [200.203.199.88]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f7I1itj18969; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:44:55 -0700 Received: from 2-166.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br (1-166.cwb-adsl.brasiltelecom.net.br [200.193.160.166]) by netbank.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id B731046818; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 22:44:04 -0300 (BRST) Received: from localhost ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]:20372 "EHLO localhost") by imladris.surriel.com with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 22:44:26 -0300 Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 22:44:23 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Ralf Baechle Cc: Brad Chapman , , , Subject: Re: Bad performance when using IPv4 and IPv6 together In-Reply-To: <20010816153755.A30079@bacchus.dhis.org> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Ralf Baechle wrote: > 6bone has been found to survive routing problems in the underlying > IPv4 structure used to interconnect IPv6 islands rather well so some > people already (try to ...) rely on it. I rely on it ;) At times I have as much as 30% packet loss between two hosts on ipv4, or the routing table entry in one of the 20 in-between hops is gone completely. In these situations, ipv6 takes me to the other host reliably. It's worth it having a partial mesh inside your pTLA, trust me... Rik -- IA64: a worthy successor to i860. http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)