Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f65BA7o14122
	for netdev-outgoing; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 04:10:07 -0700
Received: from l.himel.bg (IDENT:root@unamed.infotel.bg [212.39.68.18] (may be forged))
	by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f65BA4V14116
	for <netdev@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 04:10:05 -0700
Received: from linux.himel.bg (IDENT:ja@linux.himel.bg [127.0.0.1])
	by l.himel.bg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA12975;
	Thu, 5 Jul 2001 14:11:17 +0300
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 14:11:17 +0300 (EEST)
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
X-Sender: ja@l
To: Dror Goldstein <drgoldst@cisco.com>
cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Problem forwarding fragmented multicast packets.
In-Reply-To: <NEBBJNDEGKNJAPKHCOJOIELBDGAA.drgoldst@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10107051403060.12816-100000@l>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 612
Lines: 30


	Hello,

On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Dror Goldstein wrote:

> In the function ip_fragment (ip_output.c) when datagrame is fragmented the
> flags field (that is included in skb->cb field) is not copied from the old
> Skb to the new skb (skb2).

...

> +
> +               /* Dror g.:Copy the flags to each fragment */
> +               IPCB(skb2)->flags = IPCB(skb)->flags;
> +

	I see this fix in 2.4.4. But what about the other fields:

tc_index
nfmark

	This will allow matching these fragments by fw mark and tc index
classifiers. Or I'm overlooking something. QoS gurus?


Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>