Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f426dLl16173 for netdev-outgoing; Tue, 1 May 2001 23:39:21 -0700 Received: from imo-m02.mx.aol.com (imo-m02.mx.aol.com [64.12.136.5]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f426dKF16169 for ; Tue, 1 May 2001 23:39:20 -0700 Received: from BieshaarP@netscape.net by imo-m02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v30.10.) id 1.1b.1562c43 (16218); Wed, 2 May 2001 02:39:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from netscape.com (aimmail02.aim.aol.com [205.188.144.194]) by air-in01.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.37) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2001 02:39:03 -0400 Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 02:39:03 -0400 From: BieshaarP@netscape.net (Peter Bieshaar) To: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca Cc: BieshaarP@netscape.net, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: possible suggestion for within the Linux kernel Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <652B5AAB.43CD19F0.0225591B@netscape.net> References: <17CEC8ED.094A580A.0225591B@netscape.net> <200105011632.f41GW9U12212@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> X-Mailer: Franklin Webmailer 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk I think the benefit will be very much in environments where a couple of little, probably embedded, CPU's can communicate with more intelligence and faster. I think about the car-industry and possibly droids. Both can be done with current technology but that will always be a three steps communication, with doors it should go more directly. I also received a mail from David Brownell, that there are some patents on the door mechanism, which I wasn't aware of. Hope this answers your question. Peter Bieshaar. Richard Gooch wrote: > > [Please fix your MUA to wrap your lines at 72 characters] > Peter Bieshaar writes: > > I got this email address from Alan Cox. I think I have a really > > great idea to implement into the Linux kernel. > > But can actually not find any place to talk with anybody about > > this. It is about tcp_doors, a door equivalent like Solaris > 2.51 > > is using but then built onto the tcp layer. > > > > It will have great impact into a lot of OS stuff like mem mngmnt, > > IPC, function, security, a lot of other exceptions and stack > > management to name a few. I want to know what your ideas are and how > > something like this should be set up. > > What's the benefit to having tcp_doors? > >                 Regards, > >                     Richard.... > Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au > Current:   rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca > -- Peter Bieshaar UniSE - Unix services en diensten www.unise.nl __________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Webmail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/