Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 10:17:11 -0800 Received: from minus.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.97]:60434 "HELO ms2.inr.ac.ru") by oss.sgi.com with SMTP id ; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 10:17:01 -0800 Received: (from kuznet@localhost) by ms2.inr.ac.ru (8.6.13/ANK) id VAA29024; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 21:16:42 +0300 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200103131816.VAA29024@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: TCP sockets not flagged as writable? To: mostrows@speakeasy.net Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 21:16:42 +0300 (MSK) Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com In-Reply-To: <15022.16934.52573.377722@slug.watson.ibm.com> from "Michal Ostrowski" at Mar 13, 1 07:15:02 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Length: 416 Sender: owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;netdev-outgoing Hello! > Is this wrong or is this just my imagination? Not this and not this, the third alternative is "simply right". 8) Wakeup happens as soon as there is _enough_ space to wake up. 1 byte is not an enough. What's about exact form of wakeup predicate, criterium can be different. Current one (1/3 of space is free) was selected in 2.2 after several other variants were tried. It is not very essential. Alexey