Received:  by oss.sgi.com id <S553895AbRAGIVi>;
	Sun, 7 Jan 2001 00:21:38 -0800
Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:50048 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net")
	by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id <S553892AbRAGIVM>;
	Sun, 7 Jan 2001 00:21:12 -0800
Received: (from davem@localhost)
	by pizda.ninka.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA01182;
	Sun, 7 Jan 2001 00:04:01 -0800
Date:   Sun, 7 Jan 2001 00:04:01 -0800
Message-Id: <200101070804.AAA01182@pizda.ninka.net>
From:   "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To:     matti.aarnio@zmailer.org
CC:     baggins@sith.mimuw.edu.pl, jordy@napster.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <20010107100157.C16945@mea-ext.zmailer.org> (message from Matti
	Aarnio on Sun, 7 Jan 2001 10:01:57 +0200)
Subject: Re: Mediocre TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98SE PPP
References: <3A5665CB.30AB2158@napster.com> <20010106041103.B22665@sith.mimuw.edu.pl> <200101062342.PAA13551@pizda.ninka.net> <20010107100157.C16945@mea-ext.zmailer.org>
Sender: owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;netdev-outgoing
Content-Length: 411
Lines: 13

   Date: 	Sun, 7 Jan 2001 10:01:57 +0200
   From: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>

       "Shouldn't", you mean ?  Only heaven (pick your choice) knows
       what various access server manufacturers and M$ do in that
       case...

Nope, it just won't happen.  The VJ compression algorithm states
that when TCP options are present, no compression takes place.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com