Received:  by oss.sgi.com id <S553861AbRAGBDN>;
	Sat, 6 Jan 2001 17:03:13 -0800
Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:23698 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net")
	by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id <S553759AbRAGBC6>;
	Sat, 6 Jan 2001 17:02:58 -0800
Received: (from davem@localhost)
	by pizda.ninka.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA13879;
	Sat, 6 Jan 2001 16:44:19 -0800
Date:   Sat, 6 Jan 2001 16:44:19 -0800
Message-Id: <200101070044.QAA13879@pizda.ninka.net>
From:   "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To:     baggins@sith.mimuw.edu.pl
CC:     jordy@napster.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <20010107014150.A23851@sith.mimuw.edu.pl> (message from Jan
	Rekorajski on Sun, 7 Jan 2001 01:41:50 +0100)
Subject: Re: Mediocre TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98SE PPP
References: <3A5665CB.30AB2158@napster.com> <20010106041103.B22665@sith.mimuw.edu.pl> <200101062342.PAA13551@pizda.ninka.net> <20010107014150.A23851@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
Sender: owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;netdev-outgoing
Content-Length: 440
Lines: 14

   Date:   Sun, 7 Jan 2001 01:41:50 +0100
   From: Jan Rekorajski <baggins@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>

   And `echo 0 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_timestamps` should cure this?
   If yes then something is wrong because it didn't :( And I did turn
   it off on both sides.

No, I just stated that since VJ compression can't compress any
of the headers that header compression cannot be the cause of
the problems.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com