Received:  by oss.sgi.com id <S553793AbRAFAcg>;
	Fri, 5 Jan 2001 16:32:36 -0800
Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:17289 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net")
	by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id <S553750AbRAFAcS>;
	Fri, 5 Jan 2001 16:32:18 -0800
Received: (from davem@localhost)
	by pizda.ninka.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA07335;
	Fri, 5 Jan 2001 16:15:04 -0800
Date:   Fri, 5 Jan 2001 16:15:04 -0800
Message-Id: <200101060015.QAA07335@pizda.ninka.net>
From:   "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To:     jordy@napster.com
CC:     netdev@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <3A5665CB.30AB2158@napster.com> (message from Jordan Mendelson on
	Fri, 05 Jan 2001 16:24:43 -0800)
Subject: Re: Mediocre TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98SE PPP
References:  <3A5665CB.30AB2158@napster.com>
Sender: owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;netdev-outgoing
Content-Length: 577
Lines: 17

   Date:   Fri, 05 Jan 2001 16:24:43 -0800
   From: Jordan Mendelson <jordy@napster.com>

   I reported this a couple of months back with 2.4.0-test10 and
   hoping that it might have been fixed I tested 2.4.0 proper with no
   luck.

Jordan, if I recall correctly, last time we were analyzing dumps about
this problem from you Alexey and myself both had concluded that Linux
was doing things perfectly fine and therefore there is nothing to
"fix" on the Linux side.

If I noted a different conclusion at that time, please let me know.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com