Received:  by oss.sgi.com id <S42230AbQFIR2X>;
	Fri, 9 Jun 2000 10:28:23 -0700
Received: from minus.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.97]:5391 "HELO ms2.inr.ac.ru")
	by oss.sgi.com with SMTP id <S42199AbQFIR2Q>;
	Fri, 9 Jun 2000 10:28:16 -0700
Received: (from kuznet@localhost) by ms2.inr.ac.ru (8.6.13/ANK) id VAA23823; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 21:27:55 +0400
From:   kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Message-Id: <200006091727.VAA23823@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
Subject: Re: timers in net/ipv6
To:     ak@muc.de (Andi Kleen)
Date:   Fri, 9 Jun 2000 21:27:55 +0400 (MSK DST)
Cc:     ak@muc.de, andrewm@uow.edu.au, netdev@oss.sgi.com
In-Reply-To: <20000608213812.A22534@fred.muc.de> from "Andi Kleen" at Jun 8, 0 09:38:12 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Length: 237       
Sender: owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;netdev-outgoing

Hello!

> Ok, just hope then that there is never an exception during softirq
> execution (like spurious interrupt or NMI handled by an debugger) --
> ret_from_exception calls the softirq.

It will be blocked by local_bh_count().

Alexey