Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 15:29:37 -0700 Received: from smtprich.nortel.com ([192.135.215.8]:29332 "EHLO smtprich.nortel.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 15:29:23 -0700 Received: from zrchb213.us.nortel.com (actually zrchb213) by smtprich.nortel.com; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 17:12:48 -0500 Received: from zctwb003.asiapac.nortel.com ([47.152.32.111]) by zrchb213.us.nortel.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id 2BF0Z5KS; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 17:11:33 -0500 Received: from pwold011.asiapac.nortel.com ([47.181.193.45]) by zctwb003.asiapac.nortel.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id HNN1JP3K; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 08:11:35 +1000 Received: from uow.edu.au (IDENT:akpm@[47.181.207.103]) by pwold011.asiapac.nortel.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA07007; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 08:11:30 +1000 Message-ID: <38E91853.1481C943@uow.edu.au> Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 22:16:51 +0000 X-Sybari-Space: 00000000 00000000 00000000 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.13-7mdk i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru CC: netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: coverage References: <38E8695B.E99D0D6A@uow.edu.au> from "Andrew Morton" at Apr 3, 0 09:50:19 am <200004031512.TAA00873@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Orig: Sender: owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;netdev-outgoing kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote: > > Hello! > > > I use 'ping -l 100000' > > This does not help. Preloading only 100 packets is possible, > the rest simply disappear to blackhole. Actually, you can > increase tx_queue_len on eth0 to a cosmic value sort of > 1500000, then it will be able to generate burst of packets > for ~10 seconds. > > Alexey Well now that's odd. I tried: time ping -l10000 -c1 -s100 -q mnm to send 10,000 100 byte packets. They were all received, according to 'ifconfig eth0'. The command took 4.47 seconds wallclock time. That's a miserable 1.8 mbits/sec. The sender is an ISA ne2k on 10bT. I would expect that there would be a lot of queue pressure on the sending side under these circumstances. The sender is kernel 2.2.13. -- -akpm-