Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 19:22:38 -0800 Received: from [213.228.30.121] ([213.228.30.121]:54277 "EHLO rduhaut.duhaut.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 19:22:18 -0800 Received: from duhaut.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rduhaut.duhaut.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA11443 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 04:22:55 +0100 Message-ID: <38AF5E0E.49620DDF@duhaut.com> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 03:22:54 +0000 From: Duhaut Renaud X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i586) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Ip aliasing and IPv6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;netdev-outgoing On my linux Box (kernel 2.2.14), I use ipv6 stack and interface aliasing too. It seems to be a little problematic with net-tools (v1.52 or v1.53) because, when I try to shut down one alias, all the adresses of the interface go down ! For example : Without Ipv6 : ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.1 up ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.1.2 up ifconfig eth0 down I keep my eth0:0 running.Cool. With Ipv6: ifconfig eth0 down Drop down eth0:0 AND eth0 ! Bad. I need to use aliasing AND ipv6 stack, because i have virtual hosts on my Linux Box and all are also visible through IPv6. For instance I use 2 versions of net-tools , one without IPv6 and one who have it. But I want to know if this is "A feature or a bug" ? I've looked in ipv6 code of the 2.2 kernel and not seen any reference to aliasing stuff.It seems logic because v6 don't need aliasing, but it must handle it for v4 compatabilities, No ? Thanks you. -- Duhaut Renaud .~. Network Admin /V\ 13eme B.C.A // \\ Guilde-Reseau /( )\ renaud@duhaut.com ^`~'^