| To: | James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LSF/MM 2017: Call for Proposals |
| From: | Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:26:19 +0100 |
| Cc: | Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "lsf-pc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lsf-pc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1481122626.2354.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1480601506.2511.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1481122626.2354.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) |
On Wed 07-12-16 06:57:06, James Bottomley wrote: [...] > Just on this point, since there seems to be a lot of confusion: lsf-pc > is the list for contacting the programme committee, so you cannot > subscribe to it. > > There is no -discuss equivalent, like kernel summit has, because we > expect you to cc the relevant existing mailing list and have the > discussion there instead rather than expecting people to subscribe to a > new list. There used to be lsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Is it not active anymore? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | EDTA 4Na from Zhonglan Industry - Top EDTA 4Na manufacturer in China, Zhonglan Industry |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Lsf-pc] LSF/MM 2017: Call for Proposals, Jan Kara |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LSF/MM 2017: Call for Proposals, James Bottomley |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Lsf-pc] LSF/MM 2017: Call for Proposals, Jan Kara |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |