xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LSF/MM 2017: Call for Proposals

To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LSF/MM 2017: Call for Proposals
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:26:19 +0100
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "lsf-pc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lsf-pc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1481122626.2354.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1480601506.2511.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1481122626.2354.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
On Wed 07-12-16 06:57:06, James Bottomley wrote:
[...]
> Just on this point, since there seems to be a lot of confusion: lsf-pc
> is the list for contacting the programme committee, so you cannot
> subscribe to it.
> 
> There is no -discuss equivalent, like kernel summit has, because we
> expect you to cc the relevant existing mailing list and have the
> discussion there instead rather than expecting people to subscribe to a
> new list.

There used to be lsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Is it not active
anymore?

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>