xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Xfs lockdep warning with for-dave-for-4.6 branch

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Xfs lockdep warning with for-dave-for-4.6 branch
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:06:27 +0200
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20161019083304.GD3102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20160516132541.GP3193@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160516231056.GE18496@dastard> <20160517144912.GZ3193@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160517223549.GV26977@dastard> <20160519081146.GS3193@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160520001714.GC26977@dastard> <20160601131758.GO26601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160601181617.GV3190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20161006130454.GI10570@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20161019083304.GD3102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
On Wed 19-10-16 10:33:04, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
[...]
> So I'm all for this if this works for Dave.
> 
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks Peter!

> Please take it through the XFS tree which would introduce its first user
> etc..

Dave, does that work for you? I agree that having this followed by a
first user would be really preferable. Maybe to turn some of those added
by b17cb364dbbb? I wish I could help here but as you've said earlier
each such annotation should be accompanied by an explanation which I am
not qualified to provide.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>