xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 58/71] xfs: garbage collect old cowextsz reservations

To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 58/71] xfs: garbage collect old cowextsz reservations
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:15:01 -0700
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20160926215209.GE14092@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <147216791538.867.12413509832420924168.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <147216829394.867.16281333542262043955.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160924194234.GA1878@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160926215209.GE14092@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:52:09PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:42:34PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:38:14PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > Trim CoW reservations made on behalf of a cowextsz hint if they get too
> > > old or we run low on quota, so long as we don't have dirty data awaiting
> > > writeback or directio operations in progress.
> > 
> > FYI, at least in your latest tree we only ever seem to set
> > xfs_inode_set_cowblocks_tag in xfs_swap_extents, so this effectively
> > isn't used during normal fs usage.
> 
> The tag should be set at the end of __xfs_iomap_write_delay if we're
> creating a DA reservation in the CoW fork. 

We'll need to add that call then, as your current tree still doesn't
have it.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>