xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS reflink and development tip git trees updated

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS reflink and development tip git trees updated
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 08:36:35 -0700
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, amir73il@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20160927142726.GA5675@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20160905053317.GA15302@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160919161100.GA19849@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160920043942.GE10172@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160927052344.GD3059@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160927142726.GA5675@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 07:27:26AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:23:44PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > Ok, here's this week's for-4.9 branch:
> > 
> > https://github.com/djwong/linux/tree/for-dave-for-4.9-5
> > https://github.com/djwong/xfsprogs/tree/for-dave-for-4.9-5
> > 
> > The kernel tree includes Christoph's fixes for copy-on-write,
> > refactoring of a refcount btree function to use _btree_query_range (and
> > inclusion of the required diff_two_keys/init_high_key helpers), and
> > removal of the (totally broken) always_cow debug switch.  It also
> > contains a new error injection point to make reflink fail with ENOSPC.
> 
> Are you going to send out the patches to the list?

Yeah, I'll spam^Wmail the list once more today.

> Also it seems like the writeback updates weren't folded in but just
> added to the end, was that intentional?

Yes -- both because I'm trying to limit the number of changes to the
patches in the middle that Dave might be reviewing, and also to get
all the combined fixes out for testing quicker.

(Don't worry, I'm already working on a 4.9-6 with these things cleaned
up.)

--D

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>