Re: [PATCH]remove rcu_lock/unlock around lockless radix_tree

xfs

Re: [PATCH]remove rcu_lock/unlock around lockless radix_tree_tagged()

To:	sudip midya <midya.sudip@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH]remove rcu_lock/unlock around lockless radix_tree_tagged()
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 25 Sep 2016 07:33:12 -0700
Cc:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<CADccLx9oHDQLDifPAu+tB7pD6OmHu6Mgt7qtMSNtqrgPRNCVGQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<CADccLx9oHDQLDifPAu+tB7pD6OmHu6Mgt7qtMSNtqrgPRNCVGQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)

Hi sudip,

the patch looks fine, but the format of the email is odd.  Can you
resend it after (re-)reading Documentation/SubmittingPatches and
ajusting?

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH]remove rcu_lock/unlock around lockless radix_tree_tagged(), sudip midya Re: [PATCH]remove rcu_lock/unlock around lockless radix_tree_tagged(), Christoph Hellwig <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] libxcmd: fix counting of xfs entries in fs_table_insert, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] xfs_copy: Fix meta UUID handling on multiple copies, Christoph Hellwig
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH]remove rcu_lock/unlock around lockless radix_tree_tagged(), sudip midya
Next by Thread:	[PATCH] xfs_repair: fix segfault from uninitialized tp in mv_orphanage, Eric Sandeen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]