| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS reflink and development tip git trees updated |
| From: | "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:39:42 -0700 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20160919161100.GA19849@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20160905053317.GA15302@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160919161100.GA19849@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 09:11:00AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Can you rebase (and repost the series) on top of the preparations > in for-next that Dave just pushed out? > > That should make reviewing a whole lot easier. I'm on vacation all week (in the desert with tcp-over-cactus) but I don't want the reflink review to stall, so here's a branch atop the for-next branch that Dave announced last night: https://github.com/djwong/linux/tree/for-dave-for-4.9-3 The scary parts are the rework that I had to do to integrate with hch's delalloc rewrite. I think all the changes to xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay are right (the regression tests all pass, at least) but it could use another set of eyes. No changes to the userland tools, they're still at: https://github.com/djwong/xfsprogs/tree/for-dave-for-4.9-2 --D |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] [RFC] xfs: make xfs btree stats less huge, Darrick J. Wong |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 4-dnevno putovanje u Milano za 125 evra po osobi i druge ponude, Jeftina putovanja |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS reflink and development tip git trees updated, Darrick J. Wong |
| Next by Thread: | XFS reflink and development tip git trees updated, Darrick J. Wong |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |