Re: [PATCH] [RFC] xfs: make xfs btree stats less huge

[Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 06:28:42PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Embedding a switch statement in every btree stats inc/add adds a lot
> of code overhead to the core btree infrastructure paths. Stats are
> supposed to be small and lightweight, but the btree stats have
> become big and bloated as we've added more btrees. It needs fixing
> because the reflink code will just add more overhead again.

Talking about stats, is there any documentation for that? I was using the log
stats while working on the fail_at_unmount hang, and I couldn't find anything
other than looking into the code to see what each number means.

Cheers

-- 
Carlos